By Jackson Kwong
Does anybody else remember the trade that was initialed by Dunleavy in a desperate move to cover up Elton Brand? Well, general manager and head coach Mike Dunleavy decides to trade Zach Randolph over to Memphis for ex Clipper Quentin Richardson. An interesting deal; nevertheless, a questionable one.
Well to begin, Zach Randolph was brought over to replace Elton Brand because Brand bolted in fear of playing in the West( who really knows Brands motives.) Regardless, it was a definite questionable deal. In return for Randolph, the Clippers sent two expiring contract deals in 2010, Tim Thomas and Cuttino Mobley. Afterwards, a physical showed that Mobley had a condition and should not be playing or else it could be life threatening.
Back to the point, clearly Dunleavy made a move on desperation. With the incoming trade for Zach Randolph, the Clippers were in no position to compete in the 2010 free agency (Lebron, Wade, Bosh.) Zach Randolphs contract was to expire in two years, 2011, with an overwhelming 17 million each yeah. Granted Zach Randolphs 20-10 production seems appealing, he also hides a strong defect in return.
One downside to Zach Randolph’s production is his locker room presence. His attitude was well known during the “Jail Blazer” era. Zach Randolphs behavior was probably at its best with the Clippers. During the 39 games that he played with LA, he gave a sucker punch to Louis Amundson and was caught on drunk driving (although his DUI was later rejected in court.) With the recent trade for Q, the Clippers seem to have decided to clean up some potential locker issues.
But one thing I couldn’t overlook on Zach Randolph was his defense. The guy just can’t play defense. Throughout his career, the guy only averaged 0.3 blocks. Arguably the embarassing point for me was when Zach Randolph was benched in Michigan State because of his lack of defense. You can argue that he scores 20-10 all you like, but easily that was a big flaw in Zach Randolph. Although offense is definitely important, defense can’t be taken too lightly either. If you count back to any championship teams, they have won with their solid defense. San Antonio had Bruce Bowen, Manu Ginobli, Tim Duncan, Tony Parker (etc etc), Detroit had Ben Wallace, Rasheed Wallace, Billups, TayShaun Prince, and even the current championship team, Lakers, were able to contain Dwight Howard. Truth is, defense is more important than offense.
But this is where it gets a bit tricky. Clippers fans have openly praised a “glue guy” targeting players such as Shane Battier and TayShaun Prince. With the addition of Q, that would be a third SF playing the 3 for the Clippers (Thornton, Mardy Collins, Q). Clippers fan thought that overloading the center and power forward position as being bad, imagine overloading your team with small forwards?
Even though the Clippers needed to trade away one of their big man, I don’t think Zach Randolph was the right recipe. That’s right, I have just said that the Clippers might need Zach. Why? Well, for one, Clippers lacked offense last season. There was no lie to it. Zach’s offense might have been the one of the few gleaming light on those dark Clipper games. Now, I did say that defense won championship, but there is nothing wrong with having Randolph in the second unit. The media seems to have focused its attention more on the 6th man position anyways( Jason Terry, Manu Ginobli, Lamar Odom), so if the Clippers are winning, Zach can’t complain. As of now, the Clippers are going to rely on Chris Kaman, Deandre Jordan, Blake Griffin, and Marcus Camby to do the dirty work down low. Problem with that is Blake Griffin is just a rookie, Deandre Jordan’s game is defintiley not anywhere near Zach’s, Chris Kaman has the slipperiest hands I’ve ever seen, and Marcus Camby is definitely not a post up man. This deal possibly means the Clippers might not compete for the playoffs this year.
But this trade seems to benefit the Clippers in a few ways. One, the Clippers can now compete in the 2010 free agency, the team won’t be bothered by the extra baggage that Zach Randolph carries, and Blake Griffin will have more playing time to himself at power forward. All together, if the Clippers weren’t looking to compete this season, might as well rebuild, and the Clippers did just that.
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I don't understand - are you just reprinting this Jackson guy's article? do you have permission to do so? Even assuming you have permission, you should link to the original source as well. Common internet courtesy.
ReplyDeleteSorry for the mixup. I'm going to help LJ with the blogs from now on( he's going to blog also.) This article was done in 20mins so please dont judge the writing. I would look to improve and hope to hear constructive critism.
ReplyDeleteWe have become co-bloggers. However, only 1 person can do posts, so when he does one, I have to put By Jackson Kwong instead of him posting.
ReplyDeleteLucas - actually you both can post. I'll send you an email.
ReplyDeletexo
I appreciate and enjoy both Lucas and Jackson's insights so far. I just want to know which one I should rip for taking the easy way out and playing both sides of the fence in his Zach Randolph analysis.
ReplyDeleteGrizzlies Acquire Zach Randolph
ReplyDeleteBy Jackson Kwong
Jackson: RUN!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Well recent update:
ReplyDelete"Randolph's agent Raymond Brothers said that his client was disappointed to learn of the deal, because he felt he had found an NBA home with the Clippers.
``It's tough getting traded but that's part of this business,'' Brothers said. ``It's just unfortunate because Zach really felt comfortable in L.A. and felt like he'd found a home. He wanted me to thank the Clippers and (owner) Donald Sterling for the opportunity to play with them for a year.''
to "morandmer": I don't know who Iwould rip eithr. Randolph was a 20/10 guy with hidden downside. He's one of 5 players that I can think of that can score 20 points and at the same time can't be selected in the NBA all star game. With that said, its easily stated that Zach is very under appreciated in this league.
Its hard to say who took an easy route. I rather rip the Clippers for getting rid of their go to scorer, but I can't. Clippers just relieved themselves of some salary space for 2010, so they're a pretty clear winner also.
Zach was somewhat a winnner also because he was probably going to share some playing time with Blake the crew. Now that he's traded the Memphis, its easy to say that Memphis will have a good home for Zbo. Zach can get as many touches as he likes. (Hasheem Thabeet and Marc Gasol would probaly not be your ideal go to guy when scoring is needed.) Its safe to say that only time will tell who got the better of the two deals.
Actually, I wanted to know whether to rip Lucas or Jackson for the non-decisive, non-committal analysis of Zach. He's good but he's bad. The Clips need him but they don't. It was a good trade but it was bad. Looks like to me you guys know more about the NBA than a lot of people, including me. To me, that gives you the right to make a call every time you give us your good info in this blog. Give us more of your opinions, and don't worry if we agree with you or not. Make me jump up and say how right you are, or make me argue with you until I'm blue in the face.
ReplyDeleteBlue? I've only seen you get to red before!!!
ReplyDeleteNo doubt Zach is an offensive force (15-30 a night)...but I rather have an defensive player anyday. Zach for Q.Richardson?? that was a terrible trade IMO we could have gotten a better player...if you think that Zach was a bad defender, Q is worse.
ReplyDeleteSince I'm not a very good analysis I could be wrong...aleast we got rid of the salary cap space and hopefully a good bid for the next free agent market.
Q is a better defender than Zach. I am a better defender than Zach. Morandmer's dog Burt is a better defender than Zach, and he's blind.
ReplyDeleteHow come we didn't trade for Burt? Now I'm sad that Dunleavy made a bad move.
ReplyDeleteBtw thanks for the insight "morandmer." I always thought i added a written in less than 20 min thing in my article but I guess I didn't. I'm still an ameture! But I will try to add in your positive feedback in my next post.
ReplyDeleteAlso, can't I just say both Randolph and Clippers are clear cut winners? Randolph can score whenever he likes now, and Clippers now have salary relief?
Q is a better defender than Zach. I am a better defender than Zach. Morandmer's dog Burt is a better defender than Zach, and he's blind.
ReplyDeleteLJ are you making fun of me?
I actually think Q might be the better defender. For a 6'9? guy, he sure didn't average many blocks or steals. He always letguys blow past him on the perimeter, and whenever a guy postes up on Zach, the opponent seems pretty destined to score.
ReplyDelete